Dynamic Chiropractic

Dynamic Chiropractic Facebook Twitter
Dynamic Chiropractic
Find
Advanced Search
Wellness Blog
Dynamic Chiropractic PracticeINSIGHTS
Current Graphic
Facebook
Dynamic Chiropractic – June 17, 2008, Vol. 26, Issue 13
Dynamic Chiropractic
Printer Friendly Email a Friend PDF RSS Feed
Share |
Dynamic Chiropractic

This Is Where We Come In

By Anthony Rosner, PhD, LLD [Hon.], LLC

Those of you who can recall living in the 1940s and 1950s must remember what it was like to go to the movies. There would be a sign out on the marquee proclaiming, "Continuous performances daily." That meant you purchased your tickets, went into the theater, bought your popcorn (unless it was an art house) and sat in on the movie at whatever point it happened to be when you got there.

Some two hours, a newsreel, a cartoon, a featurette, coming attractions and an undetermined fraction of the main feature later, you would begin to recognize what was on the screen. At that point you would lean over to your partner and whisper, "This is where we came in" and either leave or treat yourself to a repeat performance of the rest of the film.

I couldn't help but think of this with regards to how antibiotics have been (ab)used to treat otitis media. I ran across a paper published in Pediatrics just last year that polled medical physicians as to their prescribing habits for children with otitis media. Despite the fact a set of guidelines had been released by the American Academy of Family Physicians and American Academy of Pediatrics recommending "watchful waiting" rather than the immediate use of antibiotics, only 15 percent of the physicians in the survey reported they actually were following that option. Instead, 83.5 percent stated they chose antibiotics because they were following the dictates of the parents who preferred immediate use of antibiotics.1 With all due respect, you as a parent should be stepping back and asking yourself: Which one of us is the physician?

That being said, you have to go back some nine years to pick up another study that showed us exactly the same thing. Only in this case, it wasn't even what the parents actually said; it was the physician's belief of what the parent was thinking. If the physician thought the parent wanted an antibiotic for treating otitis media, the physician prescribed such a pill 62 percent of the time and gave a bacterial diagnosis 70 percent of the time. If, on the other hand, the physician thought the parent was leaning away from using antibiotics, they prescribed the pill only 7 percent of the time, accompanied by a bacterial diagnosis only 31 percent of the time.2 Mind games indeed.

But where's the science - to say nothing of four years of medical school? Turns out patients' expectations and physicians' prescribing behavior are big time, having been extensively documented in the literature.3-7 Patients do seem to expect antibiotics for prescriptions, and their satisfaction rises when these expectations are met.8,9

So, you could argue that we are facing the phenomenon of patient beliefs and expectations influencing the clinical outcome. That, in itself, is a humongous topic which we won't get into here - or, as my uncle often used to say, "Don't get me started." Rather, we have additional problems when it comes to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics for treating childhood otitis media. These include the following:

A major portion of otitis media cases are not even caused by bacteria, rendering antibiotics useless. Polymerase chain-reaction assays indicated in one study that viruses without pathogenic bacteria were found in the middle-ear fluid of the majority of samples taken from children with otitis media with effusion.10 Elsewhere, Schmidt outlined earlier studies that indicated anywhere from 20 percent to 40 percent of otitis media cases in which the middle-ear fluid failed to yield bacterial strains in culture.11 These figures have been repeated in the popular press, which established that the cost of these needless prescriptions contributes to the runaway expenses we are experiencing in health care. In fact, the National Committee of Quality Assurance (NCQA) estimates this overuse of antibiotics costs the U.S. more than $250 million each year. In the words of Margaret O'Kane, NCQA president, "Obtaining powerful antibiotics should be more complicated than ordering a pizza."12

The widespread use of antibiotics could lead to calamitous bacterial resistance. A broad cross-section of mechanisms is available and well-documented as to how bacteria can become resistant to antibiotics. To make matters worse, antibiotic resistance might be transferred via plasmids from a resistant bacterial strain to a nonresistant strain that is not even the same species.13 Each time an antibiotic is used, there is the risk a resistant mutation may develop and proliferate. This simply tells us, in no uncertain terms, that the use of antibiotics does not come without a price. Increasing U.S. populations of multidrug-resistant bacteria from 1995-1998 have been extensively described.14

Side effects have been linked to the use of antibiotics for otitis media. By destroying bacteria, antibiotics could wreak havoc upon the ecological balance of the intestinal flora. This could allow proteins normally blocked from absorption to pass through the intestinal wall, leading to what is commonly known as a "leaky gut." In so doing, antibiotics could allow foreign proteins to be introduced into the bloodstream, leading to the increase of antibodies and the creation of allergic responses within the host.11 Reports have linked antibiotics to increasing appearances of asthma15,16 and cardiac repolarization, leading to sudden death17 and even hearing loss (in animal models).18,19 Again, there is no free lunch with antibiotics. (And whatever lunch is ingested might lead to problems with the antibiotics.)

The effectiveness of antibiotic use in treating otitis media has been questioned. Within the past decade, a re-evaluation of a major clinical trial, a second clinical trial, and a meta-analysis have all questioned the effectiveness of amoxicillin in managing middle-ear effusions.20-22 Given this weak evidence, you would imagine there would be cries for a revision. Indeed, these have appeared in the literature14 including a review and plea from the International Primary Care Network.23

So, has any progress been made in managing ear infections in children with standard medical care? This leads us right back to the filmgoer's lament at the beginning of this article: This is where we came in. We know medical progress and acceptance often can be measured in geological time, but not always. Just yesterday, for instance, my physician was of the opinion that all the papers in the nutritional journals claiming the benefits of the B vitamins, folic acid, coenzyme Q, and several minerals had, in just the past two years, been disproven. Thus, these supplements were no longer being recommended.

Given the available conservative alternatives for treating otitis media and the evidence in chiropractic and osteopathy that is just beginning to accumulate, one would only hope that research in these areas and perhaps doctors' ultimate recommendations could be more widespread. As far as the antibiotics for otitis media is concerned, I'm not sure I want to sit through and watch this same movie to the end without some significant changes.

References

  1. Vernacchio L, Vezina RM, Mitchell AA. Management of acute otitis media by primary care physicians: Trends since the release of the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics/American Academy of Family Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Pediatrics, 2007;120:280-7.
  2. Mangione-Smith R, McGlynn EA, Elliott MN, et al. The relationship between perceived parental expectations and pediatrician antimicrobial prescribing behavior. Pediatrics, 1999;103(4 Pt1):711-8.
  3. Virji A, Britten N. A study of the relationship between patients' attitudes and doctors' prescribing. Fam Pract, 1991;8:314-9.
  4. Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Macfarlane R, Britten N. Influences of patients' expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract illness in general practice: questionnaire study. BMJ, 1997;315(7117):1211-4.
  5. Britten N, Ukoumunne O. The influence of patients' hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors' perceptions and the decision to prescribe: a questionnaire study. BMJ, 1997;315(7121):1506-10.
  6. Vinson DC. Lutz LJ. The effect of parental expectations on treatment of children with a cough: a report from the ASPN. J Fam Pract, 1993;37(1):23-7.
  7. Webb S, Lloyd M. Prescribing and referral in general practice: a study of patients' expectations and doctors' actions. Br J Gen Pract, 1994;44(381):165-9.
  8. Hamm RN, Hicks RJ, Bemben DA. Antibiotics and respiratory infections: are patients more satisfied when expectations are met? J Fam Pract, 1996;43(1):56-62.
  9. Himmel W, Lippert-Urbanke E, Kochen MM. Are patients more satisfied when they receive a prescription? The effect of patient expectations in general practice. Scand J Primary Health Care 1997;15:118-22.
  10. Pitkaranta A, Jero J, Arruda E, et al. Polymerase chain-reaction based detection of rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and coranovirus in otitis media with effusion. J Pediatrics, 1998;133(3):390-4.
  11. Schmidt MA. Childhood Ear Infections. Berkeley, Calif.: North Atlantic Books, 1990, p. 75.
  12. O'Kane M. Letter to the Editor. USA Today, Dec. 24, 2006, p. 17A.
  13. Travis J. Reviving the antibiotic miracle? Science, 1994;264(5157):360-2.
  14. Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, et al. Increasing prevalence of multidrug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. N Engl J Med, 2000;343(26):1917-24.
  15. Wickens K, Pearce N, Crane J, Beasley R. Antibiotic use in early childhood and the development of asthma. Clin Exper Allergy, 1999;29(6):766-71.
  16. Kozyrskyj AL, Ernst P, Becker AB. Increased risk of childhood asthma from antibiotic use in early life. Chest, 2007;131(6):1753-9.
  17. Ray WA, Murray KT, Meredith S, et al. Oral erythromycin and the risk of sudden death from cardiac causes. N Engl J Med, 2004;351(11):1089-96.
  18. Sha SH, Schacht J. Are aminoglycoside antibiotics excitotoxic? Neuroreport, 1998;9(17):3893-5.
  19. Sha SH, Schacht J. Prevention of aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss. Keio J Med, 1997;46(3):115-9.
  20. Cantekin EI, McGuire TW, Griffith TL. Antimicrobial therapy for otitis media with effusion ("secretory" otitis media). JAMA, 1991;266(23):3309-17.
  21. Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Hayem M. Are antibiotics indicated as initial treatment for children with acute otitis media? A meta-analysis. BMJ, 1997;314(7093):1526-9.
  22. Damoiseaux R, van Balen F, Hoes AW, et al. Primary care based randomized double blind trial of amoxicillin versus placebo for acute otitis media in children aged under 2 years. BMJ, 2000;320(7231):350-4.
  23. Froom J, Culpepper L, Jacobs M, et al. Antimicrobials for acute otitis media? A review from the International Primary Care Network. BMJ, 1997;315(7100):98-102.

Click here for more information about Anthony Rosner, PhD, LLD [Hon.], LLC.

Dynamic Chiropractic

Dynamic Chiropractic
Printer Friendly Email a Friend PDF RSS Feed
Share |
Dynamic Chiropractic
Dynamic Chiropractic
Join the conversation
Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our User Agreement
Keep it civil and stay on topic. No profanity, vulgar, racist or hateful comments or personal attacks. Anyone who chooses to exercise poor judgement will be blocked. By posting your comment, you agree to allow MPA Media the right to republish your name and comment in additional MPA Media publications without any notification or payment.
comments powered by Disqus
Dynamic Chiropractic
Which social media platform do you use the most?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Other

Sign Up for Our Webinars
Sign Up for Our Webinars