|
| |||
![]() |
|||
|
|
Why Wellness?By K. Jeffrey Miller, DC, DABCO Wellness is the hottest buzzword in chiropractic these days. Everyone seems to be talking about it and committed to the principles behind it. At least the chiropractors are talking and committed. I'm not too sure about the chiropractic patients. Wellness care sounds like a good idea. Unfortunately, I just don't think it is going to work as well as we think.I realize I will catch a great deal of flack for this opinion. It isn't that I don't want wellness care to work. I just don't think we can overcome all of the obstacles to the idea. I offer the following as the reasons for my opinion.
Wellness sounds good, like the idea of world peace sounds good, but is either realistic? Has chiropractic chosen the hardest row to hoe? Is the hardest row to hoe the best route to increasing chiropractic utilization in America? Must we always take the road less traveled in order to prove ourselves? For a profession that has always swum upstream and struggled for recognition, aren't there easier routes to take? There are other options. A good one was provided last year by Steve Troyanovich, DC. Dr. Troyanovich's idea was to offer patients a choice between pain-based care and corrective care that leads to maintenance or wellness care. I thought the idea was reasonable. I practiced for more than 17 years and thought the idea would work well for the general population. I have brought this idea up at seminars as an instructor and it appalled some. They felt it was selling chiropractic short. They felt it is our responsibility to always offer the optimum plan of care. I agree, but Troyanovich's recommendation did not avoid offering the best possible plan of care. It offered the best option and a lesser choice. Some chiropractors only offer the best possible plan of care (corrective care plus maintenance) and refuse to accept a case if the patient will not agree to that plan. No other options are offered. It is an all-or-nothing deal. They have every right to do this and run their practices the way they choose. But what happens to patients whose life circumstances and/or financial situation will not allow them to follow the optimum plan? If a patient enters a chiropractic office in pain and can only follow through with relief care, they leave without help or drop out of care as soon as the pain is reduced. In either situation, the patient is not likely to return to that chiropractic office and may not return to chiropractic at all. The patient either leaves mad because the doctor would not help, or leaves feeling guilty and embarrassed because they could not follow through. To soothe these hurt feelings, the patient may perpetuate the old adage, "Once you go to a chiropractor, they just want you go keep going forever."Some will say this is because the patients just don't understand. Those people are absolutely right. But patients are not supposed to understand - they are patients, not chiropractors. The American public is ingrained with allopathic philosophy from their past health care experiences, the news media and countless television medical dramas. If pain care and wellness care are offered and the patient can only follow through with pain relief, the patient still benefits from chiropractic care. They also feel welcome to return to the practice for additional pain care or wellness care if their situation changes. There is no anger, guilt or embarrassment. How can this be selling chiropractic or the patient short? The dental profession has been successful in developing a wellness dental mentality in a large portion of the American population. They did this while always offering more than just the optimum plan. They will fix the painful cavity or abscess tooth and recommend straightening, capping, whitening and everything else. If the patient just wants to be out of pain and cannot complete the optimum course of care, they are still treated and invited to return if pain returns, or so they can finish the full plan. Many in chiropractic hate the idea of pain care. But to most patients, this is one of our strengths. Why not focus on this strength? Wouldn't this be an easier row to hoe? Back pain and headaches are two of chiropractic's biggest success stories and two of the most common complaints in America each year. Why not pursue these pain syndromes and introduce options initially, as Troyanovich suggests, or introduce wellness as an option after the initial course of care is underway? This second option allows time to educate the patients to the benefits of wellness care without trying to shove it down their throats right off the bat. In business, this is known as line extension. The customer enters for one product or service and is introduced to other products and services they may want or need, once the initial transaction is underway or complete. They don't have to buy everything in the shop during their first visit. Wellness overwhelms patients, especially those with poor health habits. A long series of adjustments is a significant change in a patient's life. Throwing in maintenance adjustments, daily supplements, home therapies, exercise and other good ideas is often too much too fast. Americans, like most people, do not handle change as well as they claim. When overwhelmed, people often shut down. Pressuring them to buy into wellness for themselves and everyone they know and love is even more overwhelming. Wellness is a good idea, and it fits the chiropractic thinking and tradition. Moreover, the statistics listed above show the need for wellness. Unfortunately, it may be the worst choice for our profession when trying to increase utilization by the American public. I always have been a goal-setter and believe if you are going to set goals, you should set significant ones. I also believe some goals are unrealistic and some fail when their success isn't dependent upon the people who set them, but on other people. Setting goals based on other people changing their beliefs and long-term bad habits is a huge risk. Why not meet the patients where they are and lead them? It may work much easier than trying to thrust more upon them than they are prepared for or want. Click here for more information about K. Jeffrey Miller, DC, DABCO.
|
|
|
|
||