Dynamic Chiropractic

Dynamic Chiropractic Facebook Twitter
Dynamic Chiropractic
Find
Advanced Search
Wellness Blog
Dynamic Chiropractic PracticeINSIGHTS
Current Graphic
Facebook
Dynamic Chiropractic – June 17, 1994, Vol. 12, Issue 13
Dynamic Chiropractic
Printer Friendly Email a Friend PDF RSS Feed
Share |
Dynamic Chiropractic

Projectional Fractures of the Posterior Arch of C1

By Deborah Pate, DC, DACBR

There are several occasions when there appears to be a fracture of the posterior arch of the atlas. It is important to identify whether or not a fracture is real or projectional to avoid unnecessary procedures and stress to a patient.

One common finding is the overlapping of densities from soft tissues such as the ear, that give the appearance of a lucent defect in the posterior arch of the atlas (Figure 1).

Figure 1 - Copyright – Stock Photo / Register Mark

There is also a developmental anomaly that may give the appearance of a fracture of the posterior arch. This entity is absence of a portion of the neural arch of C1 on one side. If oblique views are taken, one side will appear normal and intact; the other side will demonstrate a cleft in the arch area, the region where the posterior arch connects with the body of C1 (Figure 2).

Figure 2 - Copyright – Stock Photo / Register Mark

Fig. 2 - Unilateral absence of a portion of the neural arch of C-1. A, defect seen in a lateral protection. B, defect seen in oblique projection. C, normal side for comparison. (Ref: Karasick S, Karasick D, Wechsler RJ: Unilateral spondylolysis of the cervial spine. Skeletal Radiol 1983; 9:259.)

 

The other finding where there appears to be a fracture is due to faulty positioning of the head (a slight tilt of the head to one side). This may cause the posterior arch of C1 to appear to have bilateral defects in the arch (Figure 3).

Figure 3A - Copyright – Stock Photo / Register Mark

Figure 3B - Copyright – Stock Photo / Register Mark

Figure 3C - Copyright – Stock Photo / Register Mark

Fig. 3 - An appearance similar to that in the preceding figure may be produced by faulty positioning. A, apparent defects in neural arch of C-2 in off-lateral projection. B, defects now seen in true lateral projection. C, CT shows the neural arch to be intact. (Ref: Keats: Normal Varients, 4th Edition, Yearbook, 1988)


Many of these findings can be avoided if close attention is made to positioning the patient in the lateral projection. However, at times, this may be difficult to achieve, due to the patient's muscular spasms and true anomalies. Oblique views can be very helpful to rule out true fractures. If there is still a question, refer to a radiologist. Often a radiologist can give the final answer without having to perform more expensive studies, such as a CT scan or bone scan.

Deborah Pate, DC, DACBR
San Diego, California


Click here for more information about Deborah Pate, DC, DACBR.

Dynamic Chiropractic

Dynamic Chiropractic
Printer Friendly Email a Friend PDF RSS Feed
Share |
Dynamic Chiropractic
Dynamic Chiropractic
Join the conversation
Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our User Agreement
Keep it civil and stay on topic. No profanity, vulgar, racist or hateful comments or personal attacks. Anyone who chooses to exercise poor judgement will be blocked. By posting your comment, you agree to allow MPA Media the right to republish your name and comment in additional MPA Media publications without any notification or payment.
comments powered by Disqus
Dynamic Chiropractic
Which social media platform do you use the most?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Other

Sign Up for Our Webinars
Sign Up for Our Webinars