|
| |||
![]() |
|||
|
|
Chiropractic SerendipityBy Donald M. Petersen Jr., BS, HCD(hc), FICC(h), Publisher The Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Inc. was recently presented with a report and recommendations from the Special Committee on Health Care Fraud.1 This report directed state medical boards in "evaluating, investigating, and prosecuting physicians engaged" in questionable health care practices. The thrust of the report is to squelch "unconventional medicine" practiced by MDs. Eleven recommendations were made to state medical boards to identify, investigate, evaluate, bring disciplinary action, legislate, educate and collaborate. The report's conclusion sums it up:"It has been estimated that up to $100 billion is lost to health care fraud in the United States annually (Stern, 1994). Medical interventions that do not conform to prevailing scientific standards are becoming increasingly popular. It is estimated that in 1990 Americans made 425 million visits to providers of 'unconventional' medicine, exceeding the number of visits to all US primary care physicians, at a cost of approximately $13.7 billion (Eisenberg et al., 1995). It may be recognized that some alternative therapies may be beneficial and therefore warrant further investigation and possible integration into mainstream medical practice. However, because of the lack of reliable scientific evidence and clinical validation, safety has not been established for most of these modalities. Questionable health care practices can pose significant risks to the public safety, either by causing direct patient harm, or indirectly, by being needlessly expensive, delaying a more effective treatment, or from being administered in an incompetent manner. This proliferation of questionable health care practices and promotions will continue if left unchecked and unregulated. State medical boards are charged with protecting the public from the unprofessional, improper, incompetent, unlawful, fraudulent and the deceptive practice of medicine (Essentials. Section I) and, therefore, state medical boards must assure that physicians practice responsible medicine."Under its recommendation on evaluation, the report suggests that medical boards utilize organizations such as the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) to "provide reliable information." The NCAHF has long been outspoken about chiropractic. In 1985, their board of directors approved a position paper on chiropractic.2 These are excerpts of its recommendations: "To consumers: Chiropractic theory is nonscientific, and most chiropractors have not been taught to practice on the basis of the same body of knowledge about health and disease recognized by health scientists around the world.The report to the medical boards also suggests obtaining information to "provide a foundation for research into questionable health care practices" from the following resources: Reader's Guide to Alternative Health Methods, Zwicky, John F, PhD, Hafner, Arthur W., PhD, Barrett, Stephen, MD, and Jarvis, William T., MD. American Medical Association 1993.Note that Drs. William Jarvis and Stephen Barrett are authors or editors of three of the above books and are founding board members of the NCAHF. And while The Health Robbers is no longer available in most bookstores, that hasn't kept Dr. Barrett from expressing his viewpoint. He has put "Quackwatch" on his website. His web page "Don't let Chiropractors Fool You" comes complete with a photograph and description of a patient "proven to have been killed by neck manipulation." For years, these same people and organizations have tried to convince the public to stop seeing "nonscientific" chiropractors (and other providers); to stop using vitamins, homeopathic remedies, etc. Despite their intense efforts, the trend towards "alternative" care has not only continued, but grown dramatically. And while people like Drs. Barrett and Jarvis have been unable to stop the public from making its own health care choices, they are not completely without success. It appears that state medical boards may now decide that chiropractic and other forms of "alternative" health care are unsafe in the hands of an MD. Perhaps they have a point. One can only hope that after the NCAHF and other groups finish educating the medical boards about the dangers of "manipulation" and other forms of care, that they will move on to the physical therapy boards. Reference
Donald M. Petersen Jr. BS, HCD(hc), FICC(h) Editor/Publisher Dynamic Chiropractic E-mail: Click here for more information about Donald M. Petersen Jr., BS, HCD(hc), FICC(h), Publisher.
|
|
|
|
||